Category: creation vs evolution

Creation vs Evolution

Creation science is the Seattle Seahawks. The philosophy of evolutionism is the Denver Broncos. Let them compete on a level playing field and it is almost embarrassing to watch.  There is a reason why evolution is normally only taught in forums and classrooms where critical thinking and challenging questions aren’t permitted. It’s because evolution is impossible, disproved, ridiculous.  The evolutionist, like the creation scientist, believes in miracles, but believes in causeless miracles without God. This is irrational.  But it is what you must believe to accept evolution.  There is no natural mechanism by which any living creature can have offspring of another kind, no natural force that can cause the creation of and addition of new genetic material into an offspring that didn’t come from its parent.  And the fact that life cannot be spontaneously brought into existence from non-life, no matter how much energy is exerted in the effort, is patently obvious if you limit yourself to the natural laws of the universe.  The only way these things could have come about is for billions and billions of miracles (super-natural occurrences) to have happened without God even being there to make it so.  What a joke.  Yes, evolutionist, I believe in miracles just like you; I just understand there has to be a transcendent being who is above and beyond matter, space, time, and energy to cause it, while you vainly imagine the laws of nature constantly contradicted themselves until slime on a rock evolved into you and me.  If your mind is able to believe that this could happen if “mother nature” were just granted billions of years of trying, then you have more blind faith than I could ever be persuaded to exercise.  God is real.  A scientist who looks at the evidence and doesn’t think so isn’t thinking clearly on the subject.  It is foolish and irrational to be atheist.  It is logical and intelligent to examine the Bible’s every claim and let it prove itself true.
++Bill Nye believes in the causless miracles of matter and consciousness coming from nowhere, and yet scoffs at the idea Noah and his three adult sons could have built a boat that would float.

Evolution vs. God Documentary video

The Evolution vs. God documentary from Ray Comfort has been released. (Spoiler alert: God wins in a knockout.)

Watching it was like a flashback to my days in high school and college, when my professors also couldn’t answer a plea for some evidence that evolution might have happened, just demanded I believe it.  Excellent video. Unfortunately, most atheists and believers in evolution will be afraid to watch it, because they don’t have any evidence to back up their beliefs either.

I also especially liked that this video did not cloud the issue of the gospel with the call to “turn from your sins,” which distorts what the gospel’s call is.  Ray Comfort’s materials have often said that phrase, and like “Ask Jesus into your heart,” it is a phrase that keeps people from understanding the gospel.  We don’t ask Jesus into our hearts, and we don’t turn from our sins.  We trust in Christ and His death in our place on the cross and His resurrection to save us.

 

Good Friday > Earth Day


Earth Day? God created the earth to be the place where He would make Good Friday happen, to His eternal glory, long after the earth He created is no more. Worship, honor, and serve the Creator, not His handiwork, impressive as it is.
Good Friday? This is the day that the Lord has made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.

Who are the real skeptics?

The belief that this universe and all that is in it came about by an unplanned, unguided, unintended explosion of absolutely nothing is the most irrational of superstitions out there. And those who believe it, despite the lack of a scintilla of evidence that it could have happened, have no right to don the label of “skeptic,” as today’s agnostics and atheists are so fond of doing. They are the most gullible of people.
If I were to tell my 5-year-old that everything in the world came out of nothing at all, and that no one made it happen, even she would have enough skepticism in her innocent little mind to not only doubt my words, but completely disbelieve them. Atheists aren’t skeptics. They are people who put their skepticism to death on the altar of desire to be free from sensing any accountability to God.

The god atheists worship

Atheists today, lacking a god, often like to worship Richard Dawkins. (In the sense that they take his words as truth and accept them with the blindest of faiths.) Take a look at what that guy believes. Hard to believe he can even manage to dress himself, walk, and talk.

Science Fiction

Science Fiction
A missing link? Who do they think they’re kidding? They’re not missing a link. They’re missing the whole bloomin’ chain!

Threatened by Hawking’s statements? Hardly.

Then why would we care if silly people like Hawking and Dawkins delude themselves with the airheaded idea that there might not be a God? This video gives an answer that can actually pass the test.

Hawking’s New Book

Breaking News: This just in–Stephen Hawking’s new book actually wrote itself! Then it was published and promoted by a process of undirected natural selection.

In the beginning — Creation Series

The study of creation, and the Bible’s account of it in Genesis 1 and 2, is available for your listening here, in four parts, in English and Romanian.
Part 1–Genesis 1a
Part 2–Genesis 1b
Part 3–Genesis 2a
Part 4–Genesis 2b

Today’s evolutionist response exposes the cloudy-mindedness of atheism

So in response to my recent comments on the implausibility of the theory of macroevolution, an atheist who identified himself as having a doctorate wrote, claiming that if I accept microevolution, then I must accept macroevolution, because they are essentially the same thing, being only different in magnitude. Now, that isn’t true, because they are entirely different in process, not just scope. Microevolution happens from one generation to the next in creatures as a result of rearrangement or loss of existing genetic information. For macroevolution to exist, there would have to be ADDED genetic information over the generations, which is impossible, hasn’t ever happened, and is not happening in the modern world. It must be accepted on faith alone, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
But even if the doc were right and the only difference between micro and macro evolution was the amount of change that happens and the amount of time it takes, to suggest that this means accepting one proves the other exposes the cloudy thinking necessary for one to become an atheist. It is like saying, if you believe there are men who can run 8 miles per hour and men who can jump 6 feet off the ground, then you must accept that there are men who can run faster than an indy car and men who can jump over the clouds, because the process of running and jumping is the same, only the magnitude changes.